{"updated":"2026-10-15T16:31:54Z","content_md":"Somebody on another forum mentioned [m\u00e9tis](https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/m\u00e9tis) so I tuned up my page on the subject.  I noticed it subsumes two of [Meaningness](https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/Meaningness)'s pet topics: situated action and metarationality. I wonder if he ever talks about it explicitly.\n\n![[5kx1ctyhjytstck6y4fe26x8em]]","changelog":[{"version":1,"at":"2026-10-14T23:19:33Z","note":null},{"version":2,"at":"2026-10-15T16:31:54Z","note":null}],"transclusions":[{"id":"5kx1ctyhjytstck6y4fe26x8em","version":1}],"created":"2026-10-14T23:19:33Z","page":"f\/4kd0k6vqaxkn3rbtpkj253ec12\/","content_hash":"sha256:68ff709ddf9558bd4952fcdcf788efd1e300d4318683f436e29a176e0be9e149","id":"4kd0k6vqaxkn3rbtpkj253ec12","kind":"thread","origin":"https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/blyg\/","content_html":"<div><div><span>Somebody on another forum mentioned <a class=\"pagelink\" href=\"https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/m\u00e9tis\">m\u00e9tis<\/a> so I tuned up my page on the subject.  I noticed it subsumes two of <a class=\"pagelink\" href=\"https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/Meaningness\">Meaningness<\/a>&apos;s pet topics: situated action and metarationality. I wonder if he ever talks about it explicitly.<\/span><\/div><blockquote class=\"blyg-transclusion\" data-blyg-id=\"5kx1ctyhjytstck6y4fe26x8em\" data-blyg-version=\"1\"><div><span class=\"hover-tag-container\"><span class=\"hover-tag-lozenge\" onclick=\"toggleHoverTag(this)\">Ask Claude<\/span><div class=\"hover-tag-popup\"><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"5892e23c-01af-4624-acd1-ebe79f6d5f54\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>The search hit the Meaningness site&apos;s <code>abstract-emergent<\/code> page, which is promising. Let me look more carefully at that and also search specifically for whether David Chapman (Meaningness) mentions m\u00e9tis by name.<\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"2dd8b52e-0bce-4249-92fe-28e0ef72fcb7\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>The <code>site:<\/code> searches didn&apos;t find m\u00e9tis on either domain directly. Let me check the Meaningness page on situated cognition and the metarationality.com page on abstract\/emergent reasoning more carefully, and also search for David Chapman&apos;s writing on practical knowledge or phronesis.<\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"c36e860b-f4b7-4c9c-b747-74290dee41b6\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>This is very useful. Chapman cites <i>Seeing Like a State<\/i> and calls it &quot;meta-rational,&quot; but doesn&apos;t use the word <i>m\u00e9tis<\/i> explicitly in what&apos;s indexed. Let me now fetch the specific Substack piece where he discusses Scott, and also check whether any of Chapman&apos;s pages on situated cognition or reasonableness use the term.<\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"2c5b3f95-e5ee-4ee9-90cc-b6d719aa97d6\">\n<li class=\"block\">Now I have a thorough picture. Let me synthesize this carefully.<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"dee6c6b7-246b-4216-9175-d68e4d5df307\">\n<li class=\"block\">Based on a thorough search of both meaningness.com and metarationality.com, here&apos;s the situation:<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"7c2fe6fe-eb16-4d29-bd24-ef5cfb974acb\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>*<i>The short answer: Chapman engages heavily with the same conceptual territory as m\u00e9tis, and cites James C. Scott&apos;s <\/i>Seeing Like a State* (the book most responsible for popularizing the concept in contemporary discourse), but he does not appear to use the word <i>m\u00e9tis<\/i> explicitly.**<\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"3e7f2c60-8392-484a-984c-2431e10e84e2\">\n<li class=\"block\">Here&apos;s how the overlap breaks down:<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"21292e11-9a2c-4c15-b3f1-77c60f8d9735\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span><b>On situated action:<\/b> <\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"d3f22d46-67c2-40a3-96f1-f7e1b582dd96\">\n<li class=\"block\">Chapman&apos;s 1986 paper (republished on metarationality.com) argues that &quot;computation in this internal world is just like computation in the real one; it is just as concrete and situated.&quot; He frames this as part of &quot;a century-long conversation that re-thinks meaningness and what it is to be human.&quot;<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"834c23fe-b8c7-4412-8a85-4d2a14fb27ce\">\n<li class=\"block\">The paper is a direct ancestor of the &quot;E-word&quot; (embodied, enactive, extended, embedded, ecological) movement, and Chapman notes that he developed this framework in 1986, thirty years before the embodied cognition literature rediscovered it.<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"9041a082-4a71-432d-aaa2-6e8b460e2d55\">\n<li class=\"block\"> This is precisely the AI\/cognitive science face of m\u00e9tis \u2014 the critique of abstract, plan-first rationalism in favor of routine, situated, world-responsive activity.<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"11856a32-7c3e-4d62-ac0c-74e912b31178\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span><b>On metarationality and <i>Seeing Like a State<\/i>:<\/b> Chapman directly and explicitly engages with Scott&apos;s book, which is the central modern source for m\u00e9tis. <\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"ea395b62-f497-4983-9066-246ed7dcd92a\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>He calls <i>Seeing Like A State<\/i> &quot;meta-rational&quot; and discusses how it examines cases where &quot;oblivious rationalism that ignored context, purpose, and nebulosity&quot; caused scientific agriculture to fail, sometimes producing mass famines.<\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"c4073a42-7732-43a9-b97b-fdf74f78021f\">\n<li class=\"block\">In &quot;Seeing like a Good King,&quot; he borrows Scott&apos;s framework directly, noting that Scott&apos;s &quot;seeing&quot; is metaphorical and &quot;includes all perception, but also any means of gaining information, knowledge, and understanding.&quot;<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"d41c2ce4-0405-4432-be55-8796efdf3c8e\">\n<li class=\"block\"> He uses Scott&apos;s villager\/state distinction to build toward the idea of a &quot;Good King&quot; who can hold both concrete local knowledge and abstract systemic vision simultaneously \u2014 which is almost a literal gloss on m\u00e9tis vs. techne.<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"87e04454-652d-4637-acfd-9436a6036f1c\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span><b>The gap:<\/b> Despite all this, the word <i>m\u00e9tis<\/i> itself doesn&apos;t appear to surface in his published work. <\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"76db25d2-af5f-4b73-b982-9160d5edf4c0\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>Scott himself introduces the term in chapter 9 of <i>Seeing Like a State<\/i>, contrasting &quot;practical knowledge&quot; (m\u00e9tis, from classical Greek, denoting &quot;the knowledge that can come only from practical experience&quot;) with formal epistemic knowledge.<\/span><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"991704df-2a7b-4a32-911f-8650b9c2bf33\">\n<li class=\"block\"> Chapman cites Scott extensively but seems to prefer his own vocabulary \u2014 &quot;circumrational,&quot; &quot;reasonableness,&quot; &quot;situated activity,&quot; &quot;nebulosity&quot; \u2014 rather than adopting Scott&apos;s Greek term.<\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"nondent\" id=\"02e26972-543d-4ec5-936d-605459db4ae4\">\n<li class=\"block\"><span>So: the concept is deeply present in Chapman&apos;s work, the primary modern source (Scott) is cited and called &quot;meta-rational,&quot; but the word <i>m\u00e9tis<\/i> itself appears to be absent. If you find it anywhere, it would likely be in his Substack posts (some of which are paywalled) or in unpublished\/in-progress book sections.<\/span><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/blockquote><\/div>","version":2,"media":[],"blyg":"0.3"}