{"updated":"2026-10-01T15:33:59Z","content_md":"From [Blygger](https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/Blygger#6abab1cf-6d7f-44c1-ac58-6c0e6a419d24)\n\nKyle matthews Blygger Studio (that was fast)\n\n![[70fqbc8b34n0rvakcy6chgh1g0]]\n\n![[39864fyjhfnq617w4bc69850h7]]\n\n![[02za12dm5e3bcrxn1dwcn4kgt2]]\n\n![[7m94hy6k1j3kkxqgdj7ryfk22q]]\n\n![[7a4saqjxmnk5kzyt998zes03dm]]\n\n![[2r7p46k7ncdcjn92mde3bryt3m]]\n\n![[1rhszgzw32nknbqrz16qf1yqxq]]\n\n![[09t1g8rka9azej2512fkmkspdz]]","changelog":[{"version":1,"at":"2026-10-01T15:33:59Z","note":null,"pinned":true}],"transclusions":[{"id":"70fqbc8b34n0rvakcy6chgh1g0","version":1},{"id":"39864fyjhfnq617w4bc69850h7","version":1},{"id":"02za12dm5e3bcrxn1dwcn4kgt2","version":1},{"id":"7m94hy6k1j3kkxqgdj7ryfk22q","version":1},{"id":"7a4saqjxmnk5kzyt998zes03dm","version":1},{"id":"2r7p46k7ncdcjn92mde3bryt3m","version":1},{"id":"1rhszgzw32nknbqrz16qf1yqxq","version":1},{"id":"09t1g8rka9azej2512fkmkspdz","version":1}],"created":"2026-10-01T15:33:59Z","page":"f\/1cjtwaywhz5zj2afpjky5fx47k\/","content_hash":"sha256:634eaedefca946f6c19bf11c3c23e0d490efaa53a55b4f8b0a13427e105b500e","id":"1cjtwaywhz5zj2afpjky5fx47k","kind":"thread","origin":"https:\/\/ammdi.hyperphor.com\/blyg\/","content_html":"

From Blygger<\/a><\/p>

Kyle matthews Blygger Studio (that was fast) <\/p>

Got it running, some notes if they care<\/p>

<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>

I don't really understand this tk<\/span> stuff. I mean it is the equivalent of \/AskClaude but it doesn't do the wrapping, and doesn't have fine-grained control (but it DOES<\/b> have the ability to add extra prompt which is obviously good (although in Logseq you can just add in the text why not))<\/span><\/p>

Not actually sure how it handles the prompt, lets see...<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>

publish button has no feedback (or is broken) oh it had an error (at the top where you couldn't ee it)<\/p>

Cannot publish: fragment exceeds 1000 characters. Well then why did you generate a big chunk of text?<\/p>

OK figured out the [TK] syntax, wasn't obvious. So it DOES retain the prompt, that's good. And in a more structured way than I have been doing with Logseq.<\/p>

The published version doesn't include the prompt or any indication of AI-generation. Which I guess can be a choice! SHoudn't be the default though. (Looks like the protocol supports this fully so this is a reader choice?)<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>

Subscription<\/p>

The resolve step in subscription is unintuitive and no feedback?<\/p>

Allows duplicates which are a pain to remove.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>

Reading<\/p>

Somehow all of these blygs look kinda unpolished, but I suspect that is deliberate.<\/p>

no feedback on thumbs up (and, I realized later, this is not like a like button, its purely local and never gets shared)<\/p>

A refresh didn't pick up Venkats latest. Not sure what the mechanics are or how long updates take to percolate. (and needs a refresh button if it isn't automated)<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>

Responding<\/p>

OK it is so fucking weird not to have any kind of reply affordance. I mean I guess I can understand. But it would be trivial to add something reply-like without changing the protocol, so why make it go underground? I'm sure this is discussed somewhere.<\/p>

This is on venkat blyg, should check out others<\/p><\/div>

Weird Kyle somehow responded to a blyg of mine, in a thread with just an eyeball emoji. But he is using the same software I am...I'm confused \ud83d\udc40 Huh Apache getting into the ontology business Home - Apache Ossie (\u2026 \u2014 Kyle's blyg<\/a><\/span><\/p>

What you can do is transclusion<\/i>. But the frag selector seems borked, only showing me entries from one blyg and not the one I ased for.<\/span><\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>